Thursday, November 28, 2024

Top Harris Campaign Staff Tell Us What Went Wrong In 2024 Ele...

 
 
Quentin makes an excellent point near the end (1:23:42) saying too much of the critiquing of Dems came from it's own side. Where as Republican's once Trump was the clear nominee they closed ranks and supported him no matter what what focusing on winning. As I heard elsewhere the left has to learn to be ruthlessly pragmatic about winning. I first noticed this in 2016 where the biggest Democratic critiques from it's own side. Democratic Party groups need to learn how to unite come election time like a winning team does going into the Superbowl who put aside differences and realize they'll have better chance to win united rather than separate. Republicans have learned this and Democrats have not.

Are Left-Wing Activist Groups to Blame for Donald Trump's Win?

Monday, November 18, 2024

Jon Stewart Urges Dems to Fight Like Republicans and Exploit Loopholes

As I heard before on another podcast. Biden and Democrats seem still want to play integrity politics meanwhile the Trump and Republicans play “Fuck you“ politics. Morning Joe, Mika and many Democratic politicians(including President Biden) learned absolutely nothing in the last 10 years. AG Merrick Garland played integrity politics by waiting two years to appoint Jack Smith and now all that is waste because Donald escapes accountability and is re-elected. It
 
 Republicans clawed their way back to power not by playing nice but focusing on winning by exploiting loopholes, norms to win. Meanwhile, the Democratic Party and mainstream media seems to be stuck trying to play by the rules straight and going out of their way look like they had integrity. How has that worked so far? I'll ask again on January 20, 2025. 

Integrity politics has got us to where we are now. Doesn't mean illegal means but at least play on same field. Most of all as in sports READ THE RULE book! Republicans have apparently. Know the loopholes and look for advantages when possible. Be ruthless. You think Trump and MAGA worry about shame or how it looks?

 

This is Who We Are

 
Trump is who we are. When the era of Trump first hit about a decade ago it was said by many that he is not who we are as a country. Then after each supposed event that topple him he would come back to the right's glee and left's bewilderment and frustration. This can't be who we are, or is it? New York Times columnist Carlos Lozada contends his hold makes a case is that Trump's hold is because it is who we are or at what we've become. They see themselves in him and someone who is fighting for them. It becomes an almost cult-like hold on them.

I've listened to this podcast numerous times as it seemed to strike a point that most who've tried to figure out how Donald Trump was victorious once again despite  his shortcomings and egregious behavior. Many since the election, as Carlos notes,  were picking out issues on a relatively focused reasons like, the war in Gaza, Trump's misogyny, Governor Tim Walz over Governor Josh Shapiro as VP, the economy, the Latin vote, Trump's use anti-Trans rhetoric as too woke in ads to her word salad or speaking style as reasons she lost. While many of these may have valid points it seems to be too focused. Trump made gains along most demographics which indicates something not at ground level or even a 33,000 foot level but satellite view such as this is who we are as an entire country or at least enough to hold power. Something that was tried to be explained off as a fluke in 2016 but by now cannot be brushed off as anything but as the new normal. 

In other words we shouldn't deny Trumpism isn't who we are. It certainly is. Does mean lay prostate let every thing go? Absolutely not. Regroup, reassess and move forward. A little smarter and more aware of where we stand. We've seen Trump's season one of his own "Apprentice" show before. The "shock and Awe" of his cabinet picks already is just the beginning. Save our strength and pick our battles, they'll be many to choose. Stay in there but keep your head about you.
 
 
 
 
 

Monday, November 11, 2024

Here We Go Again

 "For this is your home, my friend, do not be driven from it; great men have done great things here, and will again, and we can make America what America must become."

- James Baldwin


Here we are again. While at work, my wife texted me, "It looks like Cheeto is winning, and I'm terrified." Working the night of the election, I could only get updates periodically on my phone. In previous elections, they came in haphazardly and did not worry about the first returns. They tend to come in haphazardly and be inaccurate.  

When I got home my wife was up, she's usually asleep, scrolling through her phone and quite upset how it was going. I  tried to be reassuring as the last election was razor thin and took days and thought it'd take days to resolve. When I was able to check the election map and when all the battle ground states were leaning red it was not a good sign. Even worse Trump was leading by 3-5 points in each which was the sign that it wasn't going to even close. In 2020 many of the these same states were 1-2 point margins(or less). When AP(Associatted Press) called Pennsylvania for Donald I knew it was over.

Since then it's been range of emotions and thoughts of what happened and why. Every pundit or talking head is giving their two cents. The theories, opinions all vary and the finger pointing has done.  In the end it really wasn't even close and actually looks like Trump won the popular vote for the first time. The Electoral college Kamala Harris(226 -295 as of this writing) looks though she might finish slightly lower than to what Hillary Clinton total's were at 232-306.  

So what happened? It make take a while for the dust to settle but here are a few thoughts. 

To start with I think Vice President did a commendable job with the daunting task of picking Biden left off who was running behind Trump by many points already. She tried to do in a 107 days what most candidates have a year or more to put together which put her at a disadvantage. Most candidates use that year or two to hone their messages and get their campaign up and running smoothly. Harris had just roughly a 100 days to do so. Some had advocated a mini primary or open contest at the Democratic Convention but any other candidate would still have the shrunkdown timeline to put the logistics together for a highly condensed national campaign. It has also been pointed out(by a recent NPR podcast) that Harris's campaign largely the Biden campaign staff and strategy. She did have some close staff but because of the short time period it was never fully hers and while they all wanted to win.  Going from Biden, a 78-year-old white man, to a younger Black/Asian woman would have had different energy and ideas that would be more ideal to for Harris.  It's a big reason why many critiqued that they didn't know who she was which she could never satisfy. 

As much as I hate to say President Joe Biden shares some responsibility. Before anything, I do think he's done a decent job as President and helped land the economy without a recession after the pandemic. Although inflation rate and unemployment rates enjoying a low period few forget the high peaks in 2022-23(fairly or unfairly). 

At first, I stuck with Joe even despite the relatively poor approval ratings though some seemed to forget Trump was never high or broke 50% in his terms. I should have been aware though. Early in 2024 when the likes of pundits like Ezra Klein, David Axelrod, and the Pod Save America crew advocated that Joe drop out I thought they were crazy and I was angry with them. Modern history didn't look kindly on late dropouts of candidates. President Lyndon Johnson's late bowing out in 1968 contributed to Nixon's victory later that year. When it seemed inevitable his support within the party was fading fast he bowed out suddenly and threw support behind his VP Harris was the smart decision. A call for a shortened primary or open convention would not only seem to be skipping over a minority woman Vice President candidate and voting block it would have even shortened the already disadvantageous shortened campaign time. Decisions had to be made quickly under less-than-ideal conditions.